I recently saw a perfect example of this when I met a young girl who lost the sight in one of her eyes  as a result of a BB gun accident.  The insurance company for the homeowner immediately offered to pay the full amount of their insured’s policy of $300,000 to the young lady.  I was flabbergasted when I learned from the parents of the child that two other attorneys agreed to take the case, but only if they received 1/3 of the recovery, or $100,000!

FINALLY FAIR FEES- Personal Injury Lawyer Changes the Way Fees Are Charged

Conduct by some lawyers helps me understand why public opinion often views attorneys as greedy. Many of the lawyers who practice personal injury law are at the top of the list of those responsible for creating the “greedy lawyer” impression. You know the mantra- “We don’t get paid unless you recover”. If their money grubbing TV and phone book ads weren’t bad enough, they go out of their way to further this bad image by taking a fee equal to 1/3 of the recovery in cases where the attorney has done little or no work.

The so-called “standard” attorney contingency fee on personal injury cases (the attorney gets paid 1/3 of the amount reached by settlement or jury verdict) in many instances is fair to both the client and the lawyer. This is true when the work involved justifies the dollars received by the attorney for the work performed. Further, it is perfectly reasonable for an attorney to expect to be compensated for the risk of non-payment that the attorney takes on in a contingency fee case. But oftentimes this “standard” fee is grossly unfair to the client, and it is understandable that the public thinks the lot of lawyers are greedy as a result.

I recently saw a perfect example of this when I met a young girl who lost the sight in one of her eyes as a result of a BB gun accident. The insurance company for the homeowner immediately offered to pay the full amount of their insured’s policy of $300,000 to the young lady. I was flabbergasted when I learned from the parents of the child that two other attorneys agreed to take the case, but only if they received 1/3 of the recovery, or $100,000! Any attorney on the case would have had no more than fifteen hours of work in the file (settlement of children’s claims requires court approval and there was a bit of other work involved), and to try and get a fee of $100,000 under such circumstances is as close to larceny as you can get.

This young girl’s story is not the first time I have seen this kind of conduct by a lawyer. I then thought “Why not do something about it?” Well I have, and what I have done I have coined “Finally Fair Fees™ ”. Instead of charging a “standard” 1/3 contingency fee in every case, I have developed a sliding fee scale where the percentage paid to the attorney on the case is more realistically tied to the work involved. This can be as little as 15% of the amount recovered if the case is resolved without starting a lawsuit; 20% if the case is resolved after suit but before the part of the case known as “disclosure” begins; 25% if the case is resolved after disclosure begins but before depositions are held, and reaches 33.33% if the case is resolved any time after depositions occur up to and including the trial.

And, in case your wondering, I would never take 15% on a case like the young girl’s with the eye injury. In fact, I told the girl’s parents they shouldn’t pay any attorney on that case on a contingency basis, but that the attorney should instead be paid at a reasonable hourly rate. What do you think?
Bookmark and Share

Free Book

An Insider's Guide to Avoiding Mistakes That Can Ruin Your Injury Case

Read More

The Ultimate Guide to Protecting Your Family From Irresponsible Drivers in New York

Read More

Talk To Me

Please fill out the form and we will be in touch with you shortly.

Name:

Phone:

Email:

Tell us more:


Law Offices of Scott D. Cannon
28 Main Street
Geneseo, New York 14454
Phone: (585) 243-9330
Toll Free: (800) 343-6918

Get Directions